Earthquake Risk Management Plan at the UTE University-Sede Santo Domingo
Keywords:
Planificación estratégica, gestión ambiental, riesgo ambiental, desastres naturales, medio ambienteAbstract
The increase in risk exposure and the information available on the cost of damage caused by disasters has promoted the interest of entities in working on how this type of threats should be managed, regardless of whether they originate naturally, or by human action. This research was carried out with the objective of developing an earthquake risk management plan at the UTE University - Santo Domingo Campus; For which the heuristic methodology of the Center for Disaster Studies and Prevention was applied. This would make it possible to quantify the level of vulnerability of the university buildings, as well as estimate the seismic threat based on the deterministic method of the Colombian Association of Seismic Engineering with an adaptation of the support instruments for the analysis and management of the natural hazards. For this purpose, historical seismic analysis was used as the main instrument; establishing the levels of threat and vulnerability, these are related in a double-entry matrix and assigning a value, which determines the level of seismic risk in the area under study. With the results obtained, the earthquake risk management plan was developed, which in turn contains strategies to reduce and mitigate the seismic disaster. This seeks to ensure that the UTE-SD authorities consider these measures within university planning.
References
Adnan, M. S. G., Abdullah, A. Y. M., Dewan, A., & Hall, J. W. (2020). The effects of changing land use and flood hazard on poverty in coastal Bangladesh. Land use policy, 99, 104868.disponible https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264837720305470
Aitsi-Selmi, A., Murray, V., Wannous, C., Dickinson, C., Johnston, D., Kawasaki, A., et al. (2016). Reflections on a science and technology agenda for 21st century disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 7(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0081-x
BID (2022) Perfil de riesgo de desastres por evento sísmico de Ecuador División de Medio Ambiente, Desarrollo Rural y Gestión de Riesgo de Desastres Serie. IDB-TN-1964 Código JEL: Q54 http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0002852 Disponible en https://goo.su/jpQ5U
Calle Mollo, S. E. (2023). Diseños de investigación cualitativa y cuantitativa. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(4), 1865-1879. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i4.7016
Cardona O.D., (1993), Manejo ambiental y prevención de desastres: dos temas asociados, Anexos, in Los desastres no son naturales, La Red, pp. 75-93. Desde: http://idea.unalmzl.edu.co/documentos/Anne-Catherine%20fase%20I.pdf
Cardona O.D., (2001).La necesidad de repensar de manera holística, los conceptos de vulnerabilidad y riesgo. Una crítica y una revisión necesaria para la gestión, 18 p. Extraida de: http://idea.unalmzl.edu.co/documentos/Anne-Catherine%20fase%20I.pdf
Egbelakin, T., S. Wilkinson, and J. Ingham. 2014. Economic impediments to successful seismic Coburn, A. W., R. J. Spence, and A. Pomonis. 1992. Factors determining human casualty levels in earthquakes: Mortality prediction in building collapse. Proceedings of the Tenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam, Netherlands: Balkema.
Filippova, O., and I. Noy. 2020. Earthquake-strengthening policy for commercial buildings in small-town New Zealand. Disasters 44 (1): 179–204. doi: 10.1111/disa.12360. View [PubMed] [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Georgescu, E., M. S. Georgescu, Z. Macri, E. M. Marino, G. Margani, V. Meita, R. Pana, H. Petran, P. P. Rossi, V. Sapienza, et al. (2018). Seismic and energy renovation: A review of the code requirements and solutions in Italy and Romania. Sustainability 10 (5): 1561. doi: 10.3390/su10051561.
Holmes, W., C. Kircher, W. Petak, and N. Youssef. 2008. Seismic performance objectives for tall buildings: A report for the tall buildings initiative. PEER Report 2008/01
Jaiswal, K., & Wald, D. J. (2008). Creating a global building inventory for earthquake loss assessment and risk management. US Geological Survey open-file report-1160 (p. 103). Reston, VA: US Geological Survey.
Lozano Cortijo, O (2008). La metodología para el análisis de vulnerabilidad y riesgo de las edificaciones en centros urbanos. Centro de Estudios y Prevención de Riesgos PREDES. Perú. Disponible https://www.eird.org/plataforma-tematica-riesgo-urbano/recopilacion-de-articulos/olga-lozano.pdf
Malavé-Laínez, J-M. y Pinoargote-Rovello, V. (2023) Análisis de vulnerabilidad sísmica en estructuras de la Parroquia Manglaralto del Cantón Santa Elena, Provincia de Santa Elena. V8-N1-1 (ene) 2023, pp. 122-143 | Recibido: 12 de octubre de 2022 - Aceptado: 01 de enero de 2023 (2 ronda rev.) Edición Especial Disponible en https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/8823213.pdf
Markhvida, M., Walsh, B., Hallegatte, S., & Baker, J. (2020). Quantification of disaster impacts through household well-being losses. Nature Sustainability, 3, 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0508-7
SGR (2012). Ecuador: Referencias Básicas para la Gestión de Riesgos 2013-2014. Quito, Ecuador. Disponible https://biblio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/libros/digital/54768.pdf
SINAGERD (2014). Plan de acciones en gestión del riesgo de desastres priorizadas para el periodo 2015-2016. Sistema Nacional de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres. Perú. Disponible https://www.dipecholac.net/docs/files/864-doc-pais-peru-2014-actualizacion2014-final.pdf
Scolobig, A., Prior, T., Schröter, D., Jörin, J., & Patt, A. (2015). Towards people-centred approaches for effective disaster risk management: Balancing rhetoric with reality. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12, 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2015.01.006
Sutley, E. J., van de Lindt, J. W., & Peek, L. (2017). Community-level framework for seismic resilience. I: Coupling socioeconomic characteristics and engineering building systems. Natural Hazards Review, 18(3), 04016014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)nh.1527-6996.0000239
Stewart,I.,S.; Piccardi,L.(2017).Seismic faults and sacred sanctuaries in Aegean antiquity. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 2017, vol. 128, no 5-6, p. 711-721.
Verschuur, J., Koks, E., Haque, A., & Hall, J. (2020). Prioritising resilience policies to reduce welfare losses from natural disasters: A case study for coastal Bangladesh. Global Environmental Change, 65, 102179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102179
Walsh, B., & Hallegatte, S. (2020). Measuring natural risks in the Philippines: Socioeconomic resilience and wellbeing losses. Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, 4, 249–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41885-019-00047-x
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 MUNDO RECURSIVO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
