Análisis de metodologías para la gestión de proyectos desde el paradigma aplicativo
Palabras clave:
hibrido, metodologías, métodos, gestión de proyectosResumen
Se han desarrollado diversos instrumentos para alcanzar mejores resultados en un mercado competitivo y creciente a nivel mundial en materia de gestión de proyectos. Esto ha llevado al estudio de numerosos autores sobre aquellas que permiten el alcance los objetivos planteados dentro de un proyecto y en un contexto globalizado. De ahí que la presente investigación busca desarrollar desde las bases teóricas a través del paradigma aplicativo de la literatura, aquellos instrumentos que mejoran la obtención de resultados dentro de la gestión de proyectos. Desde la investigación cualitativa a través de pesquisas de la interrelación e interacción sobre la estructura de la gestión de proyectos se buscó identificar aquellas de mayor eficacia vinculadas a los fines del proyecto. Esto permitieron entender la forma en que interaccionan y se adaptan según los requerimientos de los proyectos. Donde aquella gestión de proyectos de tipo híbrido se concibe como las de mejores resultados en su aplicación.
Citas
Addyman, S., Pryke, S. y Davies, A. (2020). Re-Creating Organizational Routines to Transition Through the Project Life Cycle: A Case Study of the Reconstruction of London’s Bank Underground Station. Project management journal, 51(5), 522– 537. https://journals-sagepub- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/8756972820943436
Ajam, M. (2018). Project Management beyond Waterfall and Agile. CRC Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/995405?page=0
Al Maamzi, J. y Tawfik, T. (2022). The effectiveness of agile management on traditional projects within public organizations. IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 1218(1), 1-13. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2635706216?pq- origsite=primo
AL Jarrah, M., Jarah, B. y Altarawneh, I. (2022). Toward successful project implementation: Integration between project management processes and project risk management. Problems and perspectives in management, 20(3), 258–273. https://www.businessperspectives.org/index.php/journals/problems-and-perspectives- in-management/issue-412/toward-successful-project-implementation-integration- between-project-management-processes-and-project-risk-management
Alexander, M. (2021). Top 20 Project Management Methodologies. CIO. https://www. CIO. com/article/2950579/top-project-management-methodologies. html.
Aljamee, H. y Naeem, S. (2020). The benefits of applying project management methodology on project delay: A study in construction projects in Iraq. IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 745(1), 1-16. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2562029106?pq-origsite=primo
Allan, B. (2017). The no-nonsense Guide to Project Management. Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uweng- ebooks/detail.action?docID=5325763&pq-origsite=primo
Anon (2021). Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) and the standard for project management. Project Management Institute. https://app- knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/hotlink/toc/id:kpSPMAGPMP/viewerType:toc/root_slug:guid e-project-management?kpromoter=federation
Asana (2022). ¿Cuál es la diferencia entre Waterfall, Agile, Kanban y Scrum?. Asana Inc. https://asana.com/es/resources/waterfall-agile-
AXELOS (2020). Effective Project Management: The PRINCE2 method. TSO The Stationery Office. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/effective- project- management/9780113317479/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuw mA%3D%3D&tstamp=1675517078&id=39018F5A5B044DF008C3BDACBA5BED
Belling, S. (2020). Succeeding with Agile Hybrids: Project Delivery Using Hybrid Methodologies. Apress L. P. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/succeeding-with- agile/9781484264614/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA%3 D%3D&tstamp=1675517295&id=0F3760F3CCE2C59744FFCD7F2899C7914B2F26 B0
Bentley, C. (2020). Adaptable Project Management – A combination of Agile and Project Management for All (PM4A). IT Governance Publishing. https://app-knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/web/view/khtml/show.v/rcid:kpAPMACAP2/cid:kt012G0W W1/viewerType:khtml//root_slug:adaptable-project- management/url_slug:introduction-adaptable?b-toc-cid=kpAPMACAP2&b-toc-root- slug=adaptable-project-management&b-toc- title=Adaptable%20Project%20Management%20- %20A%20Combination%20of%20Agile%20and%20Project%20Management%20for %20All%20%28PM4A%29&b-toc-url-slug=introduction- adaptable&kpromoter=federation&view=collapsed&zoom=1&page=1
Bibik, I. (2018). How to Kill the Scrum Monster Quick Start to Agile Scrum Methodology and the Scrum Master Role. Apress. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/how-to- kill/9781484236918/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA%3D %3D&tstamp=1675517397&id=4E9A5E7A04448452E8EDD7CB6353FB6CA1BB3 712
Borgatti, S., Everett, M. y Freeman, L. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Bushuiev, D. y Kozyr, B. (2020). Hybrid infrastructure project management methodologies. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 1(11), 35–43. http://journals.uran.ua/itssi/article/view/2522-9818.2020.11.035
Chaves, M., Silva, C., Ribeiro, L., Virginio, D., Glória, I. y Días, C. (2022). A new approach to managing Lessons Learned in PMBoK process groups: the Ballistic 2.0 Model. International journal of information systems and project management, 4(1), 27–45. https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3883
Cicmil, S. y Hodgson, D. (2006). New Possibilities for Project Management Theory: A Critical Engagement. Project management journal. 37(3), 111–122. https://openurl-ebsco- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/openurl?sid=Primo&volume=37&atitle=new+possibilities+fo r+project+management+theory&date=2006-08&spage=111&issn=8756- 9728&issue=3&genre=article&title=Project+management+journal.&epage=122&doi =10.1177%2F875697280603700311
Cooke, J. (2021). The PRINCE2 Agile® Practical Implementation Guide - Step-By-step Advice for Every Project Type [online]. IT Governance Ltd. https://app-knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/hotlink/pdf/rcid:kpPRINCE0K/id:kt0132YYL5/prince2- agile-practical/introduction?b-toc-cid=kpPRINCE0K&b-toc-root-slug=prince2-agile- practical&b-toc- title=PRINCE2%20Agile%C2%AE%20Practical%20Implementation%20Guide%20- %20Step-by- Step%20Advice%20for%20Every%20Project%20Type%20%282nd%20Edition%29 &b-toc-url-slug=introduction&kpromoter=federation
Fernández, D. y Fernández, J. (2008). Agile Project Management -Agilism versus Traditional Approaches. The Journal of computer information system, 49(2), 10–17. https://www-tandfonline- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/08874417.2009.11646044
Gauthier, J. y Ika L. (2012). Foundations of project management research: An explicit and six-facet ontological framework. Project Management Journal, 3(5), 5-23. https://openurl-ebsco- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/linksvc/linking.aspx?sid=Primo&volume=43&atitle=foundati ons+of+project+management+research&date=2012-10&spage=5&issn=8756- 9728&issue=5&genre=article&title=Project+management+journal.&epage=23&doi= 10.1002%2Fpmj.21288
Gemino, A., Reich, B. y Serrador, P. (2021). Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice?. Project management journal, 52(2), pp. 161–175. https://openurl-ebsco- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/linksvc/linking.aspx?sid=Primo&volume=52&atitle=agile%2 C+traditional&date=2021-04&spage=161&issn=8756- 9728&issue=2&genre=article&title=Project+management+journal.&epage=175&doi =10.1177%2F8756972820973082
Green, M. (2016). Scrum: Novice to Ninja - Methods for Agile, Powerful Development. SitePoint Pty, Limited. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Scrum-Novice-Ninja-David- Green/dp/0994346913
H Payne, J. y Turner, J. (1999). Company-wide project management: the planning and control of programmes of projects of different type. International journal of project management, 17(1), 55–59. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263786398000052
Horine, G. (2022). Project Management Absolute Beginner’s Guide. Que. https://learning- oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/project-management- absolute/9780137646913/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA %3D%3D&tstamp=1675517945&id=D3AB750764E00730E29FCEE8FBE9CA3718 079ECF
Ika, L. y Hodgson, D. (2014). Learning from international development projects: Blending Critical Project Studies and Critical Development Studies. International journal of project management, 32 (7), 1182–1196. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0263786314000052
Joslin, R. y Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International journal of project management, 33(6), 1377–1392. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0263786315000551?via%3Dihub
Jovanovic, P. y Beric, I. (2018). Analysis of the Available Project Management Methodologies. Management, 23(3), 1–13. http://management.fon.bg.ac.rs/index.php/mng/article/view/245
Kononenko, I. y Lutsenko, S. (2018). Evolution of the generalized body of knowledge on Project management. Bulletin of NTU ‘KhPI’. Series: Strategic Management, Portfolio, Program and Project Management, 1(1277), 10–17. http://pm.khpi.edu.ua/
Kononenko, I. y Lutsenko, S. (2019). Application of the Project Management Methodology Formation’s Method. Organizacija, 52(4), 286–308. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2335622461?pq-origsite=primo
Levy, R., Darren, W., Barbara, R., Peter, M., Les, O., Michael, S., Alex, G., Chris, B. y Lazaro, W. (2015). Agile Foundation: principles, practices, and frameworks. BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT. https://app-knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/kn/resources/kpAFPPF001/toc?kpromoter=federation
McHugh, O. y Hogan, M. (2011). Investigating the rationale for adopting an internationally recognised project management methodology in Ireland: The view of the project manager. International journal of project management, 29(5), 637–646. https://linkinghub-elsevier-com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S026378631000075X
Marcelino-Sadaba, S., Perez, A, Echeverria, A. y Villanueva, P. (2014). Project risk management methodology for small firms. International journal of project management. 32(2), 327–340. https://linkinghub-elsevier- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S0263786313000665
Masciadra, E. (2017). Traditional Project Management. Knowledge and Project Management, 5. Mendrisio, Switzerland: Springer.
Milosevic, D. y Patanakul, P. (2005). Standardized project management may increase development projects success. International journal of project management, 23(3), 181–192. https://linkinghub-elsevier- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S0263786304001048
Mousaei, M. y Javdani, T. (2018). A New Project Risk Management Model based on Scrum Framework and Prince2 Methodology. International journal of advanced computer science & applications, 9(4). https://www.proquest.com/docview/2656420315?pq- origsite=primo
Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: new directions for project management research. Scandinavian journal of management, 11(4), 319– 333. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/095652219500018Q
Parker, D., Charlton, J., Ribeiro, A. y Pathak, R. (2013). Integration of project-based management and change management: Intervention methodology. International journal of productivity and performance management. 62(5), 534–544. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2012-0108/full/html
Reiff, J. y Schlegel, D. (2022). Hybrid project management – a systematic literature review. International journal of information systems and project management, 10(2), 45–63. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2684216349?pq-origsite=primo
Roudias, J. (2015). Mastering Principles and Practices in PMBOK®, Prince 2®, and Scrum: Using Essential Project Management Methods to Deliver Effective and Efficient Projects. Pearson Education/FT Press. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/mastering-principles- and/9780134060880/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA%3D %3D&tstamp=1675518929&id=F47A5507726860100140B75A6B96A4F22FD683D 6
Shenhar, A. y Dvir, D. (1996). Towards a typological theory of project management. Res. Policy, 25(4), 607-632. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/0048733395008772
Snyder D. (2017). A project manager’s book of forms: a companion to the PMBOK guide. Wiley. https://learning- oreilly-com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/a- project- managers/9781119393986/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwm A%3D%3D&tstamp=1675519024&id=5DA8E921057DC69D2433BF590689F7B2F0 796F9C
Takagi, N. y Varajão, J. (2022). ISO 21500 and success management: an integrated model for project management. The International journal of quality & reliability management, 39(2), 408–427. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0920548916300848
Titov, S. y Titova, N. (2022). Hybrid project management methodologies as a sign for organizational ambidexterity. Upravlenčeskie nauki, 12(2), 55–67. https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/368
Turner, R., Ledwith, A., y Kelly, J. (2010). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Matching processes to the nature of the firm. International journal of project management, 28(8), 744–755. https://linkinghub-elsevier- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S0263786310000943
Ungureanu, A. y Ungureanu, A. (2014). Methodologies used in Project Management. Annals of ‘Spiru Haret’ University. Economic Series (English ed.), 14(2), 47– 54. http://anale.spiruharet.ro/index.php/economics/article/view/1425
Verga Matos, P., Romao, M., Miranda, J. y Abaladas, A. (2019). The adoption of project management methodologies and tools by NGDOs: A mixed methods perspective. Journal of business research, 101, 651–659. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0148296319300852
Weinstein, J. y Jacques, T. (2013). The government manager’s guide to project management. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/the-government- managers/9781567264319/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwm A%3D%3D&tstamp=1675519341&id=088BBAE0ADF8227CFAFE8E17A7E465DB F2DED3C4
Wysocki, R. (2007). Effective Software Project Management. Wiley. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/effective-software- project/9780764596360/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA% 3D%3D&tstamp=1675519394&id=63B85B848ECB8D42F9390558B15B16ABF94A 9387
Wysocki, R. (2019). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme, Hybrid. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. https://app-knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/kn/resources/kpEPMTAEHF/toc?kpromoter=federation
Zachko, I., Ivanusa, A. y Kobylkin, D. (2020). Hybrid management of programs of territorial systems development projects by means of convergence mechanisms. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 4(14), 40–46. http://journals.uran.ua/itssi/article/view/ITSSI.2020.14.040
Zasa, F., Patrucco, A. y Pellizzoni, E. (2020). Managing the Hybrid Organization: How Can Agile and Traditional Project Management Coexist?. Research technology management, 64(1), 54–63. https://openurl-ebsco- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/linksvc/linking.aspx?sid=Primo&volume=64&atitle=managin g+the+hybrid+organization&date=20210102&spage=54&issn=0895- 6308&issue=1&genre=article&title=Research+technology+management.&epage=63 &doi=10.1080%2F08956308.2021.1843331
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 MUNDO RECURSIVO
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
