Analysis of methodologies for project management from the application paradigm
Keywords:
hybrid, methodologies, methods, project managementAbstract
Various instruments have been developed to achieve better results in a competitive and growing global market in terms of project management. This has led to the study of numerous authors on those that allow the achievement of the objectives in a project and in a globalized context. The present investigation seeks to develop from the theoretical bases through the applied paradigm of the literature, those instruments that improve the obtaining of results within project management. From qualitative research through interrelation and interaction research on the structure of project management, it was sought to identify those with the greatest effectiveness linked to the purposes of the project. This allowed us to understand the way in which they interact and adapt according to the requirements of the projects. Where that hybrid type project management is conceived as the best results in its application.
References
Addyman, S., Pryke, S. y Davies, A. (2020). Re-Creating Organizational Routines to Transition Through the Project Life Cycle: A Case Study of the Reconstruction of London’s Bank Underground Station. Project management journal, 51(5), 522– 537. https://journals-sagepub- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/8756972820943436
Ajam, M. (2018). Project Management beyond Waterfall and Agile. CRC Press. https://www.vlebooks.com/Product/Index/995405?page=0
Al Maamzi, J. y Tawfik, T. (2022). The effectiveness of agile management on traditional projects within public organizations. IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 1218(1), 1-13. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2635706216?pq- origsite=primo
AL Jarrah, M., Jarah, B. y Altarawneh, I. (2022). Toward successful project implementation: Integration between project management processes and project risk management. Problems and perspectives in management, 20(3), 258–273. https://www.businessperspectives.org/index.php/journals/problems-and-perspectives- in-management/issue-412/toward-successful-project-implementation-integration- between-project-management-processes-and-project-risk-management
Alexander, M. (2021). Top 20 Project Management Methodologies. CIO. https://www. CIO. com/article/2950579/top-project-management-methodologies. html.
Aljamee, H. y Naeem, S. (2020). The benefits of applying project management methodology on project delay: A study in construction projects in Iraq. IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 745(1), 1-16. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2562029106?pq-origsite=primo
Allan, B. (2017). The no-nonsense Guide to Project Management. Cambridge University Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uweng- ebooks/detail.action?docID=5325763&pq-origsite=primo
Anon (2021). Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) and the standard for project management. Project Management Institute. https://app- knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/hotlink/toc/id:kpSPMAGPMP/viewerType:toc/root_slug:guid e-project-management?kpromoter=federation
Asana (2022). ¿Cuál es la diferencia entre Waterfall, Agile, Kanban y Scrum?. Asana Inc. https://asana.com/es/resources/waterfall-agile-
AXELOS (2020). Effective Project Management: The PRINCE2 method. TSO The Stationery Office. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/effective- project- management/9780113317479/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuw mA%3D%3D&tstamp=1675517078&id=39018F5A5B044DF008C3BDACBA5BED
Belling, S. (2020). Succeeding with Agile Hybrids: Project Delivery Using Hybrid Methodologies. Apress L. P. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/succeeding-with- agile/9781484264614/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA%3 D%3D&tstamp=1675517295&id=0F3760F3CCE2C59744FFCD7F2899C7914B2F26 B0
Bentley, C. (2020). Adaptable Project Management – A combination of Agile and Project Management for All (PM4A). IT Governance Publishing. https://app-knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/web/view/khtml/show.v/rcid:kpAPMACAP2/cid:kt012G0W W1/viewerType:khtml//root_slug:adaptable-project- management/url_slug:introduction-adaptable?b-toc-cid=kpAPMACAP2&b-toc-root- slug=adaptable-project-management&b-toc- title=Adaptable%20Project%20Management%20- %20A%20Combination%20of%20Agile%20and%20Project%20Management%20for %20All%20%28PM4A%29&b-toc-url-slug=introduction- adaptable&kpromoter=federation&view=collapsed&zoom=1&page=1
Bibik, I. (2018). How to Kill the Scrum Monster Quick Start to Agile Scrum Methodology and the Scrum Master Role. Apress. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/how-to- kill/9781484236918/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA%3D %3D&tstamp=1675517397&id=4E9A5E7A04448452E8EDD7CB6353FB6CA1BB3 712
Borgatti, S., Everett, M. y Freeman, L. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Bushuiev, D. y Kozyr, B. (2020). Hybrid infrastructure project management methodologies. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 1(11), 35–43. http://journals.uran.ua/itssi/article/view/2522-9818.2020.11.035
Chaves, M., Silva, C., Ribeiro, L., Virginio, D., Glória, I. y Días, C. (2022). A new approach to managing Lessons Learned in PMBoK process groups: the Ballistic 2.0 Model. International journal of information systems and project management, 4(1), 27–45. https://revistas.uminho.pt/index.php/ijispm/article/view/3883
Cicmil, S. y Hodgson, D. (2006). New Possibilities for Project Management Theory: A Critical Engagement. Project management journal. 37(3), 111–122. https://openurl-ebsco- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/openurl?sid=Primo&volume=37&atitle=new+possibilities+fo r+project+management+theory&date=2006-08&spage=111&issn=8756- 9728&issue=3&genre=article&title=Project+management+journal.&epage=122&doi =10.1177%2F875697280603700311
Cooke, J. (2021). The PRINCE2 Agile® Practical Implementation Guide - Step-By-step Advice for Every Project Type [online]. IT Governance Ltd. https://app-knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/hotlink/pdf/rcid:kpPRINCE0K/id:kt0132YYL5/prince2- agile-practical/introduction?b-toc-cid=kpPRINCE0K&b-toc-root-slug=prince2-agile- practical&b-toc- title=PRINCE2%20Agile%C2%AE%20Practical%20Implementation%20Guide%20- %20Step-by- Step%20Advice%20for%20Every%20Project%20Type%20%282nd%20Edition%29 &b-toc-url-slug=introduction&kpromoter=federation
Fernández, D. y Fernández, J. (2008). Agile Project Management -Agilism versus Traditional Approaches. The Journal of computer information system, 49(2), 10–17. https://www-tandfonline- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/08874417.2009.11646044
Gauthier, J. y Ika L. (2012). Foundations of project management research: An explicit and six-facet ontological framework. Project Management Journal, 3(5), 5-23. https://openurl-ebsco- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/linksvc/linking.aspx?sid=Primo&volume=43&atitle=foundati ons+of+project+management+research&date=2012-10&spage=5&issn=8756- 9728&issue=5&genre=article&title=Project+management+journal.&epage=23&doi= 10.1002%2Fpmj.21288
Gemino, A., Reich, B. y Serrador, P. (2021). Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice?. Project management journal, 52(2), pp. 161–175. https://openurl-ebsco- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/linksvc/linking.aspx?sid=Primo&volume=52&atitle=agile%2 C+traditional&date=2021-04&spage=161&issn=8756- 9728&issue=2&genre=article&title=Project+management+journal.&epage=175&doi =10.1177%2F8756972820973082
Green, M. (2016). Scrum: Novice to Ninja - Methods for Agile, Powerful Development. SitePoint Pty, Limited. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Scrum-Novice-Ninja-David- Green/dp/0994346913
H Payne, J. y Turner, J. (1999). Company-wide project management: the planning and control of programmes of projects of different type. International journal of project management, 17(1), 55–59. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0263786398000052
Horine, G. (2022). Project Management Absolute Beginner’s Guide. Que. https://learning- oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/project-management- absolute/9780137646913/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA %3D%3D&tstamp=1675517945&id=D3AB750764E00730E29FCEE8FBE9CA3718 079ECF
Ika, L. y Hodgson, D. (2014). Learning from international development projects: Blending Critical Project Studies and Critical Development Studies. International journal of project management, 32 (7), 1182–1196. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0263786314000052
Joslin, R. y Müller, R. (2015). Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. International journal of project management, 33(6), 1377–1392. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0263786315000551?via%3Dihub
Jovanovic, P. y Beric, I. (2018). Analysis of the Available Project Management Methodologies. Management, 23(3), 1–13. http://management.fon.bg.ac.rs/index.php/mng/article/view/245
Kononenko, I. y Lutsenko, S. (2018). Evolution of the generalized body of knowledge on Project management. Bulletin of NTU ‘KhPI’. Series: Strategic Management, Portfolio, Program and Project Management, 1(1277), 10–17. http://pm.khpi.edu.ua/
Kononenko, I. y Lutsenko, S. (2019). Application of the Project Management Methodology Formation’s Method. Organizacija, 52(4), 286–308. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2335622461?pq-origsite=primo
Levy, R., Darren, W., Barbara, R., Peter, M., Les, O., Michael, S., Alex, G., Chris, B. y Lazaro, W. (2015). Agile Foundation: principles, practices, and frameworks. BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT. https://app-knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/kn/resources/kpAFPPF001/toc?kpromoter=federation
McHugh, O. y Hogan, M. (2011). Investigating the rationale for adopting an internationally recognised project management methodology in Ireland: The view of the project manager. International journal of project management, 29(5), 637–646. https://linkinghub-elsevier-com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S026378631000075X
Marcelino-Sadaba, S., Perez, A, Echeverria, A. y Villanueva, P. (2014). Project risk management methodology for small firms. International journal of project management. 32(2), 327–340. https://linkinghub-elsevier- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S0263786313000665
Masciadra, E. (2017). Traditional Project Management. Knowledge and Project Management, 5. Mendrisio, Switzerland: Springer.
Milosevic, D. y Patanakul, P. (2005). Standardized project management may increase development projects success. International journal of project management, 23(3), 181–192. https://linkinghub-elsevier- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S0263786304001048
Mousaei, M. y Javdani, T. (2018). A New Project Risk Management Model based on Scrum Framework and Prince2 Methodology. International journal of advanced computer science & applications, 9(4). https://www.proquest.com/docview/2656420315?pq- origsite=primo
Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: new directions for project management research. Scandinavian journal of management, 11(4), 319– 333. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/095652219500018Q
Parker, D., Charlton, J., Ribeiro, A. y Pathak, R. (2013). Integration of project-based management and change management: Intervention methodology. International journal of productivity and performance management. 62(5), 534–544. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJPPM-10-2012-0108/full/html
Reiff, J. y Schlegel, D. (2022). Hybrid project management – a systematic literature review. International journal of information systems and project management, 10(2), 45–63. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2684216349?pq-origsite=primo
Roudias, J. (2015). Mastering Principles and Practices in PMBOK®, Prince 2®, and Scrum: Using Essential Project Management Methods to Deliver Effective and Efficient Projects. Pearson Education/FT Press. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/mastering-principles- and/9780134060880/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA%3D %3D&tstamp=1675518929&id=F47A5507726860100140B75A6B96A4F22FD683D 6
Shenhar, A. y Dvir, D. (1996). Towards a typological theory of project management. Res. Policy, 25(4), 607-632. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/0048733395008772
Snyder D. (2017). A project manager’s book of forms: a companion to the PMBOK guide. Wiley. https://learning- oreilly-com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/a- project- managers/9781119393986/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwm A%3D%3D&tstamp=1675519024&id=5DA8E921057DC69D2433BF590689F7B2F0 796F9C
Takagi, N. y Varajão, J. (2022). ISO 21500 and success management: an integrated model for project management. The International journal of quality & reliability management, 39(2), 408–427. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0920548916300848
Titov, S. y Titova, N. (2022). Hybrid project management methodologies as a sign for organizational ambidexterity. Upravlenčeskie nauki, 12(2), 55–67. https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/368
Turner, R., Ledwith, A., y Kelly, J. (2010). Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: Matching processes to the nature of the firm. International journal of project management, 28(8), 744–755. https://linkinghub-elsevier- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S0263786310000943
Ungureanu, A. y Ungureanu, A. (2014). Methodologies used in Project Management. Annals of ‘Spiru Haret’ University. Economic Series (English ed.), 14(2), 47– 54. http://anale.spiruharet.ro/index.php/economics/article/view/1425
Verga Matos, P., Romao, M., Miranda, J. y Abaladas, A. (2019). The adoption of project management methodologies and tools by NGDOs: A mixed methods perspective. Journal of business research, 101, 651–659. https://www-sciencedirect- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0148296319300852
Weinstein, J. y Jacques, T. (2013). The government manager’s guide to project management. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/the-government- managers/9781567264319/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwm A%3D%3D&tstamp=1675519341&id=088BBAE0ADF8227CFAFE8E17A7E465DB F2DED3C4
Wysocki, R. (2007). Effective Software Project Management. Wiley. https://learning-oreilly- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/library/view/effective-software- project/9780764596360/?ar%2F%3Forpq=&email=ciIoMiJ6zQl9%2BqQSotuwmA% 3D%3D&tstamp=1675519394&id=63B85B848ECB8D42F9390558B15B16ABF94A 9387
Wysocki, R. (2019). Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme, Hybrid. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. https://app-knovel- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/kn/resources/kpEPMTAEHF/toc?kpromoter=federation
Zachko, I., Ivanusa, A. y Kobylkin, D. (2020). Hybrid management of programs of territorial systems development projects by means of convergence mechanisms. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, 4(14), 40–46. http://journals.uran.ua/itssi/article/view/ITSSI.2020.14.040
Zasa, F., Patrucco, A. y Pellizzoni, E. (2020). Managing the Hybrid Organization: How Can Agile and Traditional Project Management Coexist?. Research technology management, 64(1), 54–63. https://openurl-ebsco- com.ezproxy.uwe.ac.uk/linksvc/linking.aspx?sid=Primo&volume=64&atitle=managin g+the+hybrid+organization&date=20210102&spage=54&issn=0895- 6308&issue=1&genre=article&title=Research+technology+management.&epage=63 &doi=10.1080%2F08956308.2021.1843331
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 MUNDO RECURSIVO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
